An image of a question mark painted in red paint. This image is used to symbolize whether the system is to blame in the death of  When the System Has Blood on Its Hands: The Tragic (Accidental) Death of Zayde Keohohou.

Two Sons, One Systemic Tragedy

I have to grieve two sons, separately and differently.

These words, spoken by Jante Keohohou, the mother of Zayde โ€œBuggyโ€ Keohohou and Zuberi Sharp, are the most devastating indictment of the American mental health system you will ever hear.

Zayde โ€œBuggyโ€ Keohohou: An Example of Resilience

Zaydeโ€™s Life Was Cut Short Because The System Wasnโ€™t Listening

This is where the criminal narrative ends, and the systemic indictment begins. The family, actively trying to secure help for their son, Zuberi, was met with a system designed to fail them at every turn.

The System Is the Guilty Party

This investigation into the tragedy of Zayde’s death is not solely focused on his passing, but rather how this tragedyโ€”a mother losing not one but two sonsโ€”could have been easily prevented. This blog post will be a little bit different from other entries I have delved into. This story aims to shed light on Mental Health and easy access to it, so accidents like this will never happen again. This investigation will not aim at a specific individual as the guilty party; instead, it targets an entire system that is broken. 

Hours Before the Murder: Zuberi was Rescued from a Storm Drain

The Vulnerable Victim in the Crumbling System

As a wheelchair user with cerebral palsy myself, the ultimate tragedy of Zayde’s final moments resonates with a fear I understand completely. I could not imagine the terror that Zayde must have felt: the physical inability to flee, the struggle to scream out for help, and the devastating realization that the person coming to harm you is a loved one. Knowing someoneโ€”a family member who is supposed to love youโ€”is coming at you to harm you must have been terrifying, especially for a young man who may not have been fully aware of the psychiatric crisis his older brother was facing.

When your safety, mobility, and fundamental well-being are dependent on the stability of your caregivers and the integrity of the system around you, any failure becomes an existential threat. The thought of being in your own sanctuaryโ€”your homeโ€”and being utterly unable to defend yourself against a collapse of care is the nightmare of every person with a significant physical disability. Zayde was not just a victim of a crime; he was a victim of an environment made instantly lethal by systemic negligence.

Zayde Keohohouโ€™s life story, as his mother attested, was one of resilience. Living far past his original prognosis, Zayde navigated the world in a wheelchair due to cerebral palsy. But resilience, in the face of physical disability, is inextricably linked to dependence and care. Zayde relied heavily on his family and his home environment for his safety, comfort, and mobility.

When the system failed Zuberi Sharp, it wasn’t just a failure to treat a psychiatric patient; it was a failure to protect the most vulnerable person in that entire family equation. Zayde’s cerebral palsy and mobility limitations meant he could not flee, could not physically defend himself, and could not seek help when his environmentโ€”his own homeโ€”turned dangerous. The systemโ€™s negligence in applying the 5150 law and securing a hospital bed for Zuberi translated directly into a life-threatening risk for Zayde.

For those familiar with the 5150 law, it is generally viewed as the primary safeguard for an individual experiencing a psychiatric crisis. But this tragedy forces us to ask: What non-psychiatric standard of “reasonable human behavior” was the hospital applying? No rational adult becomes trapped in a storm drain. The fact that EMS had to extricate him proved beyond any doubt that he was “gravely disabled.” Yet, they discharged him. Had the law allowed paramedics to make the 5150 call, recognizing by a reasonable person’s standard that Zuberi should not have been stuck in that storm drain, a 72-hour psychiatric hold could have been initiated. But because the law is currently so rigid, the paramedics were legally unable to do so, meaning this entire tragedy could have been prevented.

This tragedy forces us to acknowledge that failing mental health infrastructure is not just a public health crisis; it is a disability safety crisis. The American mental health system, by letting a gravely disabled man walk free, essentially placed an axe into the hands of a person with an active psychiatric disorder, pointed it at a disabled child who could not move, and walked away.

The Legal Aftermath and Accountability

Following the attack, Zuberi Sharp was apprehended at nearby Newbury Park High School, nude and on the football field, a haunting final display of his untreated psychiatric crisis. He was subsequently charged with murder and corporal injury to a child, along with special allegations that underscore the victim’s vulnerability and the use of a deadly weapon.

Initially, criminal proceedings were suspended pending a mental competency hearing. However, the system has delivered its latest verdict: Zuberi Sharp was found competent to stand trial in July 2025. This ruling means the state has determined he now understands the charges against him and can assist in his own defense. Crucially, while this decision moves the case toward a criminal trial, it does not settle the question of his mental state or culpability at the moment of Zayde’s death. The indictment remains: the system’s response to Zuberi’s severe mental health crisis was not intervention and treatment, but prosecution, funneling a profoundly ill man into the criminal justice systemโ€”the very outcome the family desperately tried to prevent.

The charges include the special allegation that the victim (Zayde) was vulnerable, a necessary legal classification that highlights the very fact that his cerebral palsy and immobility were exploited by the system’s failure. 

The Eerie Shadow of Prior Family Violence

 When a Mother’s Sorrow Demands a Call to Action

While the legal system now focuses on punishment and competency, the mother, Jante Keohohou, has already delivered the true verdict: she has been forced to grieve two sons. Her sorrow has become an unintended call to action, demanding that California’s mental health laws and resources be reformed.

The Call for Reform: From 5150 to Safety

This tragedy must serve as more than just a heartbreaking case study; it must be a catalyst for change. The system that failed Zayde and Zuberi is not unique to Ventura Countyโ€”it is a mirror reflecting the broken mental health infrastructure across the nation. For every person with a physical disability who relies on a family member for care, the rigidity of the 5150 law and the chronic lack of secure psychiatric beds remain an unacceptable safety risk.

The changes we must demand are clear:

  • Expand 5150 Authorization to Front-Line EMS: Currently, paramedics cannot initiate a 5150 hold. This law must be amended to allow paramedic captains or designated high-level EMS professionals to initiate a hold in situations where a person exhibits behavior that no reasonable, non-psychotic individual would attempt (like becoming trapped in a storm drain). First responders cannot be forced to watch a crisis unfold and then lack the legal authority to intervene.
  • Re-evaluating “Gravely Disabled”: The criteria must be expanded to legally require consideration of recent, documented behavior (like the storm drain incident) rather than relying solely on the patient’s presentation at the moment of evaluation in a safe, controlled hospital room.
  • Mandatory Capacity: Every county must be legally mandated to maintain a specific number of fully staffed, secure psychiatric beds to ensure that no individual meeting the criteria for a hold is discharged simply due to a lack of space. A bed must be found, even if it requires an inter-county transfer.
  • Disability-Specific Safety: Crisis intervention training for hospital staff and law enforcement must explicitly address the increased vulnerability of disabled family members when a caregiver is undergoing a psychiatric emergency.

We cannot accept a system where the difference between life and death is whether a psychiatric bed is empty or full.

Conclusion: Never Grieve Two Sons Again

Zayde “Buggy” Keohohou, the resilient drummer who lived on “aloha,” deserved a life protected by the very institutions we fund to ensure public safety. His death, by an axe wielded by a mentally ill brother who the system consciously chose to release, was not a tragic accident of fateโ€”it was a preventable system failure.

Jante Keohohou said, “I have to grieve two sons, separately and differently.” Her words are not just an expression of grief; they are a profound warning. They tell us that until we reform the restrictive laws and eliminate the resource deficits that turn a mental health crisis into a disability safety crisis, the system will continue to have blood on its hands. It is up to us, advocates and concerned citizens, to ensure Zayde’s voice, and the voices of all vulnerable people, are heard so that no other family ever has to bear this unimaginable double loss.

Until next time, be wise, stay safe, support  and love one another!

 ~Jennifer AKA Wheelchair Detective ๐Ÿ’š

#MentalHealthFailure #5150Reform #DisabilityJustice #SystemicInjustice #WheelchairDetective #ZaydeKeohohou #MentalHealthAwareness #VulnerableVictims


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Verified by MonsterInsights